+- Forum (https://www.boriel.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Compilers and Computer Languages (https://www.boriel.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=12)
+--- Forum: ZX Basic Compiler (https://www.boriel.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+---- Forum: How-To & Tutorials (https://www.boriel.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+---- Thread: Fill Routine (/showthread.php?tid=439)
Fill Routine - britlion - 02-27-2012
I FINALLY (I've been meaning to for years) Got around to making Alvin Albrecht's Fill routine work in ZX BASIC, I think.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4903664/SPFill.zip
Compile SPPFill.bas and it pulls in all the other bits, which I've hacked to ignore timex modes.
Boriel - I think this, with a bit of clean up, should possibly go into the compiler as available.
Thanks, Na_th_an for reminding me of SPLIB2, which made me see this again, and go "Right, I'm gonna do this this time..."
Re: Fill Routine - na_th_an - 02-29-2012
Now THIS is what I was looking for! Thanks, man, now it's time to port SUVLEIR to pure, native ZX Basic, and I'm giving you tons of credits for it! (I was using SUVLEIR in a ZXBasic project, but I *had* to use that ugly, external binary compiled with z88dk from my BASIC code using ugly POKEs and CALLs...)
Re: Fill Routine - na_th_an - 02-29-2012
I'm having problems. A call to the routine seems to mess up something (maybe some register should be preserved?). My routine is simple, quoting the interesting bit:
Code:
While (endOfDrawing > binAddress)
cmd = Peek (binAddress)
binAddress = binAddress + 1
If cmd < 192 Then
x = Peek (binAddress)
binAddress = binAddress + 1
y = 191 - cmd
dx = x: dx = dx - cx ' ZX Basic doesn't like type mix
dy = y: dy = dy - cy ' ZX Basic doesn't like type mix
Draw dx, dy
cx = x
cy = y
ElseIf cmd = 192 Then
x = Peek (binAddress)
y = 191 - Peek (binAddress + 1)
binAddress = binAddress + 2
Plot x, y
cx = x
cy = y
ElseIf cmd = 193 Then
x = Peek (binAddress)
y = Peek (binAddress + 1)
ex = Peek (binAddress + 2)
binAddress = binAddress + 3
SPPFill (x, y, @gpPatterns + (ex << 3))
End If
WendNotice the call to SPPFill towards the end of the code. If I comment that line, the vector drawing renders OK (albeit, without fills), but if I leave it uncommented, it somehow messes something so binAddress goes elsewhere and it draws random lines until the program crashes.
I've found that somehow ZX Basic doens't like IX messed with, so if I do:
Code:
Asm
push ix
End Asm
SPPFill (x, y, @gpPatterns + (ex << 3))
Asm
pop ix
End AsmIt just works! Not a big deal, but I just wanted you to know.
I might have something to publish very soon
Re: Fill Routine - britlion - 02-29-2012
Ah yes. ZX Basic points IX into the stack, and uses it as a stack reference (variable x is IX+a etc). Since SPPFill uses that I should push and pop it in there, I think. I'll experiment when I have a little time.
Re: Fill Routine - boriel - 02-29-2012
na_th_an Wrote:I've found that somehow ZX Basic doens't like IX messed with, so if I do:That's it. ZX Basic requires IX register to be preserved before exiting/entering BASIC functions. It's used to manage the stack frame: the parameters, for example, are loaded using (IX+n), etc.
Code:Asm
push ix
End Asm
SPPFill (x, y, @gpPatterns + (ex << 3))
Asm
pop ix
End Asm
It just works! Not a big deal, but I just wanted you to know.
I might have something to publish very soon
Re: Fill Routine - na_th_an - 03-01-2012
Good to know
I found about it using a debugger (I found ld sp, ix just after returning from a Sub).
Re: Fill Routine - na_th_an - 03-07-2012
I've updated my vector drawing/displaying package. Release here: http://www.mojontwins.com/mojoniaplus/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=891
Short tutorial (albeit in spanish) here: http://tcyr.wordpress.com/2012/03/07/suvleir-3-0-super-ultra-vector-library-experience-inspire-redux-3-0/
Re: Fill Routine - britlion - 03-07-2012
Very nice, Na_th_an!
Re: Fill Routine - na_th_an - 03-07-2012
Only possible thanks to your work
Re: Fill Routine - slenkar - 03-07-2012
good idea to draw background screens that way
Re: Fill Routine - boriel - 03-07-2012
hock: I'm still *shocked* (just arrived from work, a hard day...)This library *should* go integrated with the compiler. May I :?:
BTW as stated before, I've started 2.x branch. This would need extensive compile testing... (if someone dares).
The 2.x branch aims to be a new different and extensively rewritten compiler (it might even transform your spectrum into a Commodore VIC-20 :?: :?
. So ...
Re: Fill Routine - na_th_an - 03-08-2012
As always, feel free to use whatever I produce in the compiler library
If you like, I can try the new compiler branch. I'm developing a series of tutorials and I can try to compile everything with the new version and report how it goes.
Re: Fill Routine - slenkar - 03-09-2012
Nathan I like your avatar at ojodepez-fanzine.net/
Re: Fill Routine - boriel - 03-18-2012
britlion Wrote:Boriel - I think this, with a bit of clean up, should possibly go into the compiler as available.Thanks, for this!
Thanks, Na_th_an for reminding me of SPLIB2, which made me see this again, and go "Right, I'm gonna do this this time..."
I'm about to do so, however, notice there are ASM routines called inc and dec screen position. Very (almost identical) routines are already packeted with the optimized DRAW routine (It's really very optimized!). I think it would be a good idea to replace SPPixelUP: body with a simple call to INCY / DECY routines, or vice versa, replace DRAW INC/DEC y routines with these ones.
They are almost identical, except some flag check.
Since DRAW is alwaws packed with ZX BASIC I guess it would be rather easy to replace them so no duplicated code is included and so, some precious bytes saved!
Re: Fill Routine - britlion - 04-07-2012
You could also add extra labels to the inbuilt functions, so they are collected with SPPixelUp and down? This way at least the labelling is consistent with the whole SPLIB2 system, should it be implemented in full.
(in short, replace two of Albrecht's routines with the inbuilt ones, but be able to jump to them using the same naming convention as he has in everything else)
There may be more of his routines that can be replaced, of course.
Edit: Oh, there is a difference: exit : Carry = moved off screen
So we'd need to replace the routine with
SPPixelUp:
call INCY
CP $40
ret
This would be shorter, it's true; though it buries an extra call and some flagging in it.