07-01-2012, 08:11 PM
it does seem to compile faster good one

speed of compilation
|
07-01-2012, 08:11 PM
it does seem to compile faster good one
![]()
07-02-2012, 11:46 AM
I noticed a speedup of circa 100%. Excellent!!!
1500 lines of program compile now in 9 seconds with s888, same program was compiled in 16 seconds with s882.
------------------------------------------------------------
http://lcd-one.da.ru redirector is dead Visit my http://members.inode.at/838331/index.html home page!
12-24-2012, 10:48 AM
I was reading this over, and decided to give -O3 another try. I generally don't use it, because even though it should produce a binary that does the same thing, I've never actually got it to work. It either fails to compile, or produces a binary that doesn't behave the same way..
With the latest version of Berksman I have, and the latest version of the compiler: Without O3 - compiles perfectly. (And I notice a score bug I have to fix!) With O3: Fails to compile. Traceback (most recent call last): File "zxb.py", line 317, in <module> File "zxb.py", line 272, in main File "optimizer.pyc", line 2278, in optimize File "optimizer.pyc", line 1456, in update_goes_and_comes IndexError: list index out of range Build Failed! (To be fair, I did expect the fact I have an Im2 routine to be a deal breaker. No idea how to persuade it to keep that) Edit2: Actually, the ISR doesn't call any named functions. It just jumps to a piece of code @address. That ought to work.. Latest source attached ![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|