Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bug report with print64 routine
I will check this. BTW which program version are you using?
If you don't have 1.9.9 please download it an use it (or the 1.10.0 beta I post in the other topic). In the directory tests/runtime (only available in the git repository) there's a print64 test which include printat64 and it works ok.

I don't understand why +7 and +8 are needed. I tried your example in red (with the printat64 uncommented) and it worked as expected. Compiled example attached to this message.

Attached Files
.tap   p64.tap (Size: 2.25 KB / Downloads: 1)

Messages In This Thread
Bug report with print64 routine - by maeloterkim - 02-08-2020, 07:29 PM
RE: Bug report with print64 routine - by boriel - 05-10-2020, 10:43 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)