Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
byte loops (*solved*)
#7
Sounds logical, but it means a complete rewrite of the FOR NEXT Routine for signed types. I wonder if a loop 20 TO 140 would work with BYTE type... I'm not at home to test it...
------------------------------------------------------------
http://lcd-one.da.ru redirector is dead
Visit my http://members.inode.at/838331/index.html home page!
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)