04-20-2012, 06:56 AM
Sounds logical, but it means a complete rewrite of the FOR NEXT Routine for signed types. I wonder if a loop 20 TO 140 would work with BYTE type... I'm not at home to test it...
------------------------------------------------------------
http://lcd-one.da.ru redirector is dead
Visit my http://members.inode.at/838331/index.html home page!
http://lcd-one.da.ru redirector is dead
Visit my http://members.inode.at/838331/index.html home page!