12-28-2011, 11:31 PM
This is something I'd like to address.
Unfortunately, I don't know the MSX2 architecture and need more information or, if you know it, your help will be very appreciated: I will create another thread for it. In fact, I'm heavily rewriting some compiler modules to enable other targets.
Also the alternative sub calls must be implemented, I guess. so DRAW x, y could be also called Draw(X,Y). This will allow to remove the DRAW, INK and other ZX Spectrum specific commands to an external library while maintaining compatibility with current programs.
MSX DOS BASIC is slightly different and I guess genuine uses would like the compiler to mimic their BASIC as much as possible (the same applies to amstrad).
Unfortunately, I don't know the MSX2 architecture and need more information or, if you know it, your help will be very appreciated: I will create another thread for it. In fact, I'm heavily rewriting some compiler modules to enable other targets.
Also the alternative sub calls must be implemented, I guess. so DRAW x, y could be also called Draw(X,Y). This will allow to remove the DRAW, INK and other ZX Spectrum specific commands to an external library while maintaining compatibility with current programs.
MSX DOS BASIC is slightly different and I guess genuine uses would like the compiler to mimic their BASIC as much as possible (the same applies to amstrad).