03-20-2010, 03:55 AM
I do completely agree that new features should wait, personally.
Not sure if LD A,R and LD R,A are new features :-)
But yes, this is the sort of thing that should be wishlist, really. It came up here because you posted code that you suggested would work - and that was a hiccup with it. It's a very useful feature though!
Hopefully, a couple of assembler adjusts shouldn't break anything. But I'm thinking that we're stable now, unless someone finds anything broken.
(Though, I'm writing this before testing the latest version :-) )
The one I had this morning was pretty solid, though. My only real worry is the time the assembler is taking, and we can call that a feature request for next time.
Also, to save you from pulling your hair out, we should probably make you stick to one major adjustment per day. *laugh* I noticed that ...e was mentioned, and it's gone already, and now I find that's because we're on version f!
Not sure if LD A,R and LD R,A are new features :-)
But yes, this is the sort of thing that should be wishlist, really. It came up here because you posted code that you suggested would work - and that was a hiccup with it. It's a very useful feature though!
Hopefully, a couple of assembler adjusts shouldn't break anything. But I'm thinking that we're stable now, unless someone finds anything broken.
(Though, I'm writing this before testing the latest version :-) )
The one I had this morning was pretty solid, though. My only real worry is the time the assembler is taking, and we can call that a feature request for next time.
Also, to save you from pulling your hair out, we should probably make you stick to one major adjustment per day. *laugh* I noticed that ...e was mentioned, and it's gone already, and now I find that's because we're on version f!