11-29-2013, 06:22 PM
Here's the latest with 1.3.0 s1121:
(using my benchmark suite listed above)
Mixed results. I increased iterations to try to get a finer view of it than the frames variable. Not much change - if anything very very slightly slower, if we allow for rounding errors in the previous results, it's /very/ close, though. Still worth noting that some other compilers (e.g. Zip2) have aced that integer test in half the time.
And again - bugfixes are unfortunately making the code a little bit more convoluted, I think.
(using my benchmark suite listed above)
Code:
BM1 BM2 BM3 BM4 BM5 BM6 BM7 BM8 BMDRAW
Sinclair 4.46 8.46 21.56 19.82 25.34 60.82 87.44 23.30 80.18
ZX Basic 1.26 -O3 2.12 20.78
ZX Basic 1.26-r1603 -O3 0.94 20.78 (17.14 with fSin)
ZX Basic 1.2.8-r2153 -O3 1.36 29.06 (24.18 with fSin)
ZX Basic 1.2.8-s644 -O3 1.34 29.02 (24.22 with fSin) 30.42
ZX Basic 1.2.8-s682 -O3 0.88 20.56 (16.94 with fSin) 21.14
ZX Basic 1.2.8-s696 -O3 0.90 20.60 (16.98 with fSin) 21.18
ZX Basic 1.2.8-s758 -O3 0.90 20.76 (17.10 with fSin) 21.32
ZX Basic 1.2.9-s815 -O3 0.90 20.54 (16.92 with fSin) 21.08
ZX Basic 1.3.0-s971 -O3 0.90 20.80 (17.16 with fSin) 21.40
ZX Basic 1.3.0-s1121 -O3 0.898 20.818(17.200 with fSin) 21.40Mixed results. I increased iterations to try to get a finer view of it than the frames variable. Not much change - if anything very very slightly slower, if we allow for rounding errors in the previous results, it's /very/ close, though. Still worth noting that some other compilers (e.g. Zip2) have aced that integer test in half the time.
And again - bugfixes are unfortunately making the code a little bit more convoluted, I think.