![]() |
<qbasic> in the docs - Printable Version +- Forum (https://www.boriel.com/forum) +-- Forum: Compilers and Computer Languages (https://www.boriel.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=12) +--- Forum: ZX Basic Compiler (https://www.boriel.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=11) +---- Forum: Documentation (https://www.boriel.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +---- Thread: <qbasic> in the docs (/showthread.php?tid=240) |
<qbasic> in the docs - programandala.net - 06-09-2010 Why the <qbasic> extension is used in the docs? The following code has been taken from the FUNCTION page: Code: <qbasic>FUNCTION Factorial(x AS Ulong) AS Ulong The extension highligths the code but also links the keywords to http://www.qbasicnews.com Re: <qbasic> in the docs - programandala.net - 06-09-2010 I've just searched for an example in Wikipedia. It uses the following extension: Code: <source lang="Qbasic"> It seems Mediawiki has several highlighting extensions: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Syntax_highlighting_extensions Anyone acquainted with the issue? Re: <qbasic> in the docs - britlion - 06-09-2010 Nope. I followed Boriel's examples - and went with a <qbasic> tag for code. Seems to come out rather small; but it does work. How to tag stuff in there I honestly am not sure about as a style guide - I've just used other stuff as a template. Re: <qbasic> in the docs - boriel - 06-09-2010 There are both <freebasic> and <qbasic> tags, and both can be used. Surprisingly, <qbasic> looks fancier! ![]() But I didn't realise it links to qbasic. If so, all those tags must be removed in favour of <freebasic>. Another alternative is to edit the syntax color scheme... but this will take a little more time. Update: Confirmed! :? I'll remove any qbasic tag and use freebasic ones instead. Also will try to change the coloring scheme. Re: <qbasic> in the docs - boriel - 03-14-2011 Update: Well, I think this has been previously discussed somewhere, but the right tag for the Wiki is <zxbasic> :wink: So, please, use it from now on. |